From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9815 invoked by alias); 20 May 2013 20:04:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9767 invoked by uid 89); 20 May 2013 20:04:05 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,TW_IB autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 May 2013 20:04:05 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1UeWJO-0002Qb-TC from Sandra_Loosemore@mentor.com ; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:04:02 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.39]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 20 May 2013 13:04:03 -0700 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:04:02 -0700 Message-ID: <519A81AE.50401@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 20:04:00 -0000 From: Sandra Loosemore User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Haley CC: Subject: Re: [ping**2] libjava cross-compilation patches References: <519A76EF.40701@codesourcery.com> <519A7927.3050704@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <519A7927.3050704@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-q2/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 On 05/20/2013 01:27 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 05/20/2013 08:18 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: >> We've been trying to get this set of configuration patches to support >> cross-compilation of libjava approved since 2009; most recently I pinged >> them last July. Can somebody please review them? > > I'm sorry. They look OK to me; please commit. > > I presume that you have re-checked them with the testsuite and the current > sources. If you have any test failures please let us know. I actually have not done that yet, but I will do so before committing anything. I was hesitant to spend a lot of time on refreshing the patches given the previous lack of interest in them. :-P -Sandra