From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3272 invoked by alias); 26 Dec 2013 22:48:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3250 invoked by uid 89); 26 Dec 2013 22:48:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 22:48:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBQMmWbu011402 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 26 Dec 2013 17:48:32 -0500 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-196.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.196]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBQMmTqP000779; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 17:48:30 -0500 Message-ID: <52BCB23C.9090304@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 22:48:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Tobler , GCC Patches , Java Patches Subject: Re: [patch] powerpc64 FreeBSD support for boehm-gc References: <52B4C195.1050305@fgznet.ch> <52B5CF90.6010904@redhat.com> <52BB7418.80402@fgznet.ch> In-Reply-To: <52BB7418.80402@fgznet.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-q4/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 On 12/26/2013 12:11 AM, Andreas Tobler wrote: > On 21.12.13 18:27, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 12/20/2013 10:15 PM, Andreas Tobler wrote: >>> Ok for gcc trunk? >> >> OK, thanks. >> > > May I get this one down to 4.8 too? Not really needed, but for > completeness. Results will follow... No objections from me. Andrew.