public inbox for java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
To: Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>, Michael Eager <eager@eagerm.com>,
	 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>,
	davem@redhat.com, gcc-patches List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Libjava test failure Was: [PATCH] microblaze: microblaze.md: Use 'SI' instead of 'VOID' for operand 1 of 'call_value_intern'
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 23:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54332A10.7030803@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54332336.70501@gmail.com>

On 10/7/14 7:18, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 10/7/14 1:29, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Oct 6, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> For me, "make -k check" is suitable for one sub-system (e.g. for cross
>>> building, and mainly focus on gcc), but not for global check (full
>>> non-cross building check):
>>
>> In our world, there is no sub-system, so, talk of such is outside the scope of gcc.
>>
>> Let me repeat what he said differently.
>>
>> You have two choices, fixing the port so that there are no unexpected failures or running check with -k.
>>
>> IÂ’d like to get to the point where all primary/secondary platforms can use make check directly, weÂ’re not there yet.
>>
>> The idea is that the single return value tells if if the suite passed or not.  This is an absolute measure, that, when achieved means one never has to compare previous/present results, just know that the suite passed.  Sometimes simple is better.
>>
>>> - "make check" is the standard check for global,
>>
>> No sub-system, no global.
>>
> 
> Theoretically, in each system (include gcc), always can be separated
> into several 'sub-systems', and then 'global' means the system itself.
> 
> In our case, we say let 'global' pass checking means let gcc, gfortran,
> g++, libjava ... all pass checking. But for mainly focus on constructing
> environments, I will try to use upstream glibc instead of Darwin glibc:
> 
>  - If fix Throw_2, we know it is environments construction issue.
> 
>  - Else, I shall skip it (since "make -k check" should be OK).
> 
> And after finish testsuite under Darwin, within this month, I shall try
> to find and send a patch for gcc, and pass testsuite under Darwin (it
> seems it is not quite difficult to me).
> 
> 

It is really unlucky, The upstream glibc does not support Darwin! And
sorry, send patches to glibc is really out of my current border, so I
have to give up. :-(

  bash-3.2# ../glibc/configure --with-prefix=/release/Darwin/ --with-sysroot=/release/Darwin
  checking build system type... x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0
  checking host system type... x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0
  checking for gcc... gcc
  checking for suffix of object files... o
  checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
  checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
  checking for g++... g++
  checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
  checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
  checking for readelf... no
  checking for sysdeps preconfigure fragments... aarch64 alpha arm hppa i386 m68k microblaze mips powerpc s390 sh sparc tile x86_64 checking whether gcc compiles in -mx32 mode by default... no
  
  configure: running configure fragment for add-on libidn
  *** The GNU C library is currently not available for this platform.
  *** So far nobody cared to port it and if there is no volunteer it
  *** might never happen.  So, if you have interest to see glibc on
  *** this platform visit
  ***	http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/porting.html
  *** and join the group of porters


And I guess, this thread can be ended, and next, I shall try to find a
patch for gcc, and let it pass testsuite under Darwin.


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang

Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed

      reply	other threads:[~2014-10-06 23:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bekwguasixaphab5pghrhbxp.1411603920412@email.android.com>
2014-10-05  3:10 ` Chen Gang
2014-10-05  3:26   ` Chen Gang
2014-10-06  4:03     ` Chen Gang
2014-10-06  8:37       ` Libjava test failure Was: " Andrew Haley
2014-10-06 13:48         ` Chen Gang
2014-10-06 13:54           ` Andrew Haley
2014-10-06 14:21             ` Chen Gang
2014-10-06 14:30               ` Andrew Haley
2014-10-06 14:54                 ` Chen Gang
2014-10-06 15:00                   ` Andrew Haley
2014-10-06 15:30                     ` Chen Gang
2014-10-06 17:29                       ` Mike Stump
2014-10-06 23:12                         ` Chen Gang
2014-10-06 23:41                           ` Chen Gang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54332A10.7030803@gmail.com \
    --to=gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=eager@eagerm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=java-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=mikestump@comcast.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).