From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28511 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2015 19:24:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28492 invoked by uid 89); 11 Aug 2015 19:24:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:24:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD52615775E; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zebedee.pink ([10.3.113.14]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7BJO9ed005525; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:24:10 -0400 Message-ID: <55CA4BD9.8070107@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:24:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Law , Uros Bizjak , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" CC: java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Tom Tromey Subject: Re: [PATCH, libjava/classpath]: Fix overriding recipe for target 'gjdoc' build warning References: <55CA44C8.7000209@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <55CA44C8.7000209@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-q3/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 On 08/11/2015 07:54 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > It's probably time for the occasional discussion WRT dropping > gcj/libjava from the default languages and replace them with either Ada > or Go. > > gcj/libjava are dead IMHO. I have no objections. GCJ has been tremendously useful bootstrapping the OpenJDK ecosystem, but we no longer need it in order to have free Java. Andrew.