public inbox for java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
	       "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	       java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, libjava/classpath]: Fix overriding recipe for target 'gjdoc' build warning
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CB5BB7.4090703@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mvxxdxys.fsf@tromey.com>

On 08/11/2015 08:47 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Jeff> It's probably time for the occasional discussion WRT dropping
> Jeff> gcj/libjava from the default languages and replace them with either
> Jeff> Ada or Go.
>
> It's long past time to remove it.  It's only had minimal maintenance for
> years now.  No one is writing new features for it or fixing bugs.  There
> aren't any significant users.
>
> I've always felt I should be the one to pull the trigger.  If this is
> acceptable I can take a stab at preparing a patch.
>
> I thought maybe this would also enable deleting boehm-gc, zlib, or
> libffi; but I see now they all have other users in the tree now.
Just to be clear, I'm not talking about total removal, just removal from 
the default languages.

In the past this has stalled on issues like how will asynch-exceptions 
be tested and the like.

My inclination is to replace GCJ with Go, but Ian wasn't comfortable 
with that when I suggested it a couple years ago.  The other obvious 
alternative is Ada -- my testing showed that using Ada would further 
slow down bootstrap/regression test time which is undesirable.

I could live with either, but I'd lean towards Go.

jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-12 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-07 11:22 Uros Bizjak
2015-08-11 18:03 ` Uros Bizjak
2015-08-11 18:54   ` Jeff Law
2015-08-11 19:24     ` Andrew Haley
2015-08-11 19:34       ` Jeff Law
2015-08-12  2:48     ` Tom Tromey
2015-08-12 14:44       ` Jeff Law [this message]
2015-08-12 14:57         ` Andrew Haley
2015-08-12 16:23           ` Ian Lance Taylor
2015-08-12 16:21         ` Tom Tromey
2015-08-12 16:24           ` Ian Lance Taylor
2015-08-12 16:47             ` Jeff Law
2015-08-12 16:59               ` Ian Lance Taylor
2015-08-13 10:00               ` Richard Biener
2015-08-13 21:31                 ` Jeff Law
2015-08-14  7:44                   ` Richard Biener
2015-08-14  9:24                     ` Andrew Haley
2015-08-20  2:35       ` Andrew Hughes
2015-08-20  4:37         ` Tom Tromey
2015-08-20  8:24           ` Matthias Klose
2015-08-20  8:32             ` Andrew Haley
2015-08-20 14:57               ` Andrew Hughes
2015-08-20 15:27                 ` Andrew Haley
2015-08-20 15:47                   ` Jeff Law
2015-08-20 16:03                     ` Andrew Hughes
2015-08-20 16:08                       ` Andrew Haley
2015-08-20 16:26                         ` Andrew Hughes
2015-08-20 16:38                         ` Richard Biener
2015-08-20 16:39                           ` Andrew Haley
2015-08-20 17:35                       ` Jeff Law
2015-08-20 17:39                         ` Andrew Hughes
2015-08-20 15:52                   ` Andrew Hughes
2015-08-20 16:34                     ` Richard Biener
2015-08-20 16:59                       ` Andrew Hughes
2015-08-20 17:35                         ` Andrew Hughes
2015-08-20 18:05                           ` Richard Biener
2015-08-20 21:06                             ` Joseph Myers
2015-08-20 22:32                             ` Andrew Hughes
2015-08-24 16:39                               ` Jeff Law
2015-08-20 14:58           ` Andrew Hughes
2015-08-20  2:48   ` Andrew Hughes
2015-08-20  6:20     ` Uros Bizjak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55CB5BB7.4090703@redhat.com \
    --to=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=java-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).