From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 53307 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2015 09:24:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 53273 invoked by uid 89); 14 Aug 2015 09:24:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 09:24:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE8E8A0491; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 09:24:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-173.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.173]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7E9Nvqx031027; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 05:23:58 -0400 Message-ID: <55CDB3AD.1060204@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 09:24:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Biener , Jeff Law CC: Ian Lance Taylor , Tom Tromey , Uros Bizjak , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , GCJ-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH, libjava/classpath]: Fix overriding recipe for target 'gjdoc' build warning References: <55CA44C8.7000209@redhat.com> <87mvxxdxys.fsf@tromey.com> <55CB5BB7.4090703@redhat.com> <871tf81nrk.fsf@tromey.com> <55CB7885.6090900@redhat.com> <55CD0CC0.5050100@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-q3/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 On 14/08/15 08:43, Richard Biener wrote: > So what about removing classpath from the repository? We still > retain basic language support via java/ javax/ and gnu/ that way > I believe. I don't think we do. Andrew.