From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 122948 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:44:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 121886 invoked by uid 89); 23 Nov 2015 09:44:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:44:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4070B5BA31; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-116-30.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.30]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tAN9iXBP025402; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 04:44:33 -0500 Subject: Re: update zlib to 1.2.8 To: Matthias Klose , GCC Patches , GCJ-patches References: <565297F7.5070004@ubuntu.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils From: Andrew Haley Message-ID: <5652E001.8040902@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:44:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <565297F7.5070004@ubuntu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-q4/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 On 23/11/15 04:37, Matthias Klose wrote: > In GCC zlib is only used for libjava; for binutils and gdb it is used when > building without --with-system-zlib. This just updates zlib from 1.2.7 to 1.2.8 > (released in 2013). Applies cleanly, libjava still builds and doesn't show any > regressions in the testsuite. Ok to apply (even if we already are in stage3)? Fine by me; GDB assent is more important. Andrew.