From: TJ Laurenzo <tlaurenzo@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Patch to fix PR9861
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5652dcd505092608293f1d332d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17208.3700.569158.749521@zapata.pink>
Andrew Haley wrote:
> I wonder what this does to debugging. I'm going to try it now.
If you build gdb with the patched cp-demangle.c the only difference
*should* be that demangled names will include the return type (without
cp-demangle.c patched, you will only see mangled names). I have not
tested this against gdb so I am interested to know how it goes.
I have tested this against binutils by applying the cp-demangle.c
patch and verifying that demangling names in object files works
properly (ie. nm -C). I have also added a couple of test cases to
libiberty that exercise this change.
TJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-26 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-22 21:13 TJ Laurenzo
2005-09-22 21:28 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-09-22 21:33 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-09-22 21:48 ` David Daney
2005-09-22 22:06 ` TJ Laurenzo
2005-09-22 22:12 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-09-23 18:57 ` TJ Laurenzo
2005-09-26 15:04 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-26 15:30 ` TJ Laurenzo [this message]
2005-09-26 15:42 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-26 15:59 ` TJ Laurenzo
2005-09-26 16:32 ` TJ Laurenzo
2005-09-26 17:17 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-26 17:28 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-09-26 17:43 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-26 17:33 ` TJ Laurenzo
2005-09-26 17:46 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-26 18:02 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-26 18:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-26 18:09 ` TJ Laurenzo
2005-09-26 18:12 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-26 18:25 ` TJ Laurenzo
2005-09-26 18:33 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-26 18:38 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-26 18:41 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-09-26 18:55 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-26 19:35 ` Bryce McKinlay
2005-09-26 23:33 ` TJ Laurenzo
2005-09-27 10:21 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-27 13:44 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-27 13:57 ` TJ Laurenzo
2005-09-27 18:04 ` Tom Tromey
2005-09-27 18:32 ` TJ Laurenzo
2005-09-27 18:54 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-27 18:33 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-27 14:39 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-09-27 16:31 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-26 18:03 ` TJ Laurenzo
2005-09-26 18:05 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-26 18:21 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-09-26 18:24 ` Andrew Haley
2005-09-26 17:50 ` David Daney
2005-09-23 1:39 ` Ranjit Mathew
2005-09-23 3:50 ` TJ Laurenzo
2005-09-22 22:01 ` TJ Laurenzo
2005-09-22 22:08 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-09-22 22:11 ` TJ Laurenzo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5652dcd505092608293f1d332d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tlaurenzo@gmail.com \
--cc=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ian@airs.com \
--cc=java-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=tj@laurenzo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).