From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29974 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2016 16:23:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29952 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jan 2016 16:23:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=life X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:23:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BF9B91FD5; Sun, 3 Jan 2016 16:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-116-92.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.92]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u03GNOxw008048; Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:23:25 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] [java] bump libgcj soname To: Matthias Klose , Jakub Jelinek References: <55365991.4030806@ubuntu.com> <20150421141125.GW1725@tucnak.redhat.com> <55365BB2.4080603@ubuntu.com> <20150421141924.GX1725@tucnak.redhat.com> <55365EE0.8070202@ubuntu.com> <20150421143747.GY1725@tucnak.redhat.com> <5687E158.7000401@ubuntu.com> <5687EF4D.5030304@redhat.com> <5687F269.7030109@ubuntu.com> <5687F698.20106@redhat.com> <56890829.4020601@ubuntu.com> <56892D5F.1050301@redhat.com> <568943AC.20108@ubuntu.com> Cc: GCJ-patches , "gcc-patches@gnu.org" From: Andrew Haley Message-ID: <56894AFC.5040608@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:23:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <568943AC.20108@ubuntu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-q1/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 On 03/01/16 15:52, Matthias Klose wrote: > No, libgcj versions up to 4.9.3 didn't change the value for releases taken from > the same branch. All of 4.9.0, 4.9.1, 4.9.2, 4.9.3 have the same > GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSION. But 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 have *different* GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSIONs. > >> > Why change this rule now, at this stage of GCJ's life? > This was changed by the change of the version schema, an unintential change for > GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSION. I want to keep it that way, not change it with every > release from the gcc-5 branch. Because effectively we've done an arithmetic shift left on the GCC version numbering, I guess? So where we would have had 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, we now have 5.1, 5.2, 5.3? If that's the idea, your patch is OK. Thanks, Andrew.