On 03.01.2016 17:23, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 03/01/16 15:52, Matthias Klose wrote: >> No, libgcj versions up to 4.9.3 didn't change the value for releases taken from >> the same branch. All of 4.9.0, 4.9.1, 4.9.2, 4.9.3 have the same >> GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSION. But 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 have *different* GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSIONs. >> >>>> Why change this rule now, at this stage of GCJ's life? >> This was changed by the change of the version schema, an unintential change for >> GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSION. I want to keep it that way, not change it with every >> release from the gcc-5 branch. > > Because effectively we've done an arithmetic shift left on the GCC version > numbering, I guess? So where we would have had 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, we now > have 5.1, 5.2, 5.3? yes, exactly. > If that's the idea, your patch is OK. committed the attached patch to the gcc-5-branch. Matthias