From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 59363 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2016 18:18:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 59345 invoked by uid 89); 22 Feb 2016 18:18:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HTo:U*roger, approaching, regularly X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:18:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B44D8553A; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slagheap.utah.redhat.com (ovpn-113-79.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.79]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u1MIIKN6031327; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:18:21 -0500 Subject: Re: [JAVA PATCH] Enable more array bounds check elimination To: "roger@nextmovesoftware.com" , java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <4F362C11-3DAA-4A9A-AEAB-089C20B3590C@nextmovesoftware.com> From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <56CB50EC.1000006@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:18:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4F362C11-3DAA-4A9A-AEAB-089C20B3590C@nextmovesoftware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-q1/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2 On 02/22/2016 11:10 AM, roger@nextmovesoftware.com wrote: > > It has been a while since my last contribution. It has been. I ran into some of your eyesopen.com colleagues a couple years back at SC12 or SC13. It'd obviously be great to have you contributing regularly again. Note that we're rapidly approaching the gcc-6 release; since this isn't a regression bugfix, it'll be tabled until gcc-7 is open for development. Jeff