From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 43188 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2015 17:17:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 43176 invoked by uid 89); 21 Apr 2015 17:17:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx6-phx2.redhat.com Received: from mx6-phx2.redhat.com (HELO mx6-phx2.redhat.com) (209.132.183.39) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:17:54 +0000 Received: from zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.19]) by mx6-phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3LHHqbA013129; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:17:52 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:17:00 -0000 From: Andrew Hughes To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Matthias Klose , GCJ-patches , gcc-patches@gnu.org Message-ID: <5949968.3625033.1429636672771.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150421171033.GA1725@tucnak.redhat.com> References: <55365991.4030806@ubuntu.com> <20150421141125.GW1725@tucnak.redhat.com> <540967716.3621440.1429635844249.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20150421171033.GA1725@tucnak.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [patch] [java] bump libgcj soname MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-q2/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 ----- Original Message ----- > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:04:04PM -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 04:07:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > bump the libgcj soname on the trunk, as done for every release cycle, > > > > > > Is that really needed though these days? > > > Weren't there basically zero changes to libjava (both libjava and > > > libjava/classpath) in the last 2 or more years? > > > The few ones were mostly updating Copyright notices, minor configure > > > changes, but I really haven't seen anything ABI changing for quite a > > > while. > > > > > > > On the Classpath side, there's a bunch of stuff to merge in that would > > change the ABI. It's a matter of finding a good point at which to do it > > and time to do so. I keep missing the right point in the gcc lifecycle. > > Now might be a good time (any time next 6.5 months or so), and if that is > done, surely I have no issue with bumping the soname. > Ok, that should be possible. > Jakub > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: ed25519/35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222 PGP Key: rsa4096/248BDC07 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07