From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 60689 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2016 18:40:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 60624 invoked by uid 89); 4 Oct 2016 18:40:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*UA:2.2104, H*x:2.2104, D*comcast.net, Stump X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 18:40:11 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=SVR-IES-MBX-04.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1brUdJ-000148-A5 from Iain_Sandoe@mentor.com ; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:40:05 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (137.202.0.87) by SVR-IES-MBX-04.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:39:59 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ From: Iain Sandoe In-Reply-To: <0E421C5A-7EF5-4182-A13B-BF9AEAF90215@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 18:40:00 -0000 CC: Andrew Haley , Matthias Klose , GCC Patches , GCJ-patches , Mike Stump Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <6DA7C7D0-314E-4A5E-8B35-5A8EA2F74CD8@mentor.com> References: <78f841e7-808b-58d0-7913-3ec0d19630a0@redhat.com> <4deb7e45-e428-d819-aabc-748abe8f7686@redhat.com> <0E421C5A-7EF5-4182-A13B-BF9AEAF90215@comcast.net> To: Rainer Orth X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) To SVR-IES-MBX-04.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.4) X-SW-Source: 2016-q4/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 > On 4 Oct 2016, at 18:23, Mike Stump wrote: >=20 > On Oct 4, 2016, at 1:41 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: >>=20 >> On 04/10/16 09:39, Rainer Orth wrote: >>> Hi Matthias, >>>=20 >>>> On 05.09.2016 17:13, Andrew Haley wrote: >>>>> As discussed. I think I should ask a Global reviewer to approve this >>>>> one. For obvious reasons I haven't included the diffs to the deleted >>>>> gcc/java and libjava directories. The whole tree, post GCJ-deletion, >>>>> is at svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcj/gcj-deletion-branch >>>>> if anyone would like to try it. >>>>=20 >>>> still breaks bootstraps when configured with --enable-objc-gc. >>>>=20 >>>> the immediate step should be to fix the bootstrap failure, as an addit= ional step >>>> to remove boehm-gc from the gcc sources and be able to use an external= boehm-gc. >>>=20 >>> the first part is handled by my unreviewed patch >>>=20 >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg02437.html >>=20 >> Looks obvious to me, fixes bootstrap. I think no-one will complain >> if you check it in. >=20 > I don't know who wants to review it, but if people want me to, Ok. The i= dea is that if ObjC is the last remaining user in tree for boehm-gc, then r= easonably I'm the last man standing. Of course, if others want to review a= pprove the patch, I'm fine with that.=20=20 >=20 > I'm fine with patches to externalize boehm-gc if people want to push that= direction. +1 Iain