From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21082 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2012 17:19:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 21073 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2012 17:19:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com (HELO mx3-phx2.redhat.com) (209.132.183.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:19:13 +0000 Received: from zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.19]) by mx3-phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA7HJCcc020655; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:19:12 -0500 Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:19:00 -0000 From: Andrew Hughes To: Matthias Klose Cc: GCJ-patches Message-ID: <755776202.6699923.1352308752446.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <50997550.4060904@ubuntu.com> Subject: Re: classpath merge for gcc-4.8? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q4/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 ----- Original Message ----- > classpath wasn't merged for the gcc-4.7 release, is anybody working > on a merge > for gcc-4.8? stage1 is finished now, however I think this should > still be > possible to do for 4.8. > I was planning one for when I get back from Toronto. I wanted to do it earlier but all these trips get in the way. Can we still get it in after stage 1? There are a number of important fixes to go in, notably a regression in the locale data & a performance regression in DateFormatSymbols spotted by the JikesRVM team which dates back to Classpath 0.98. There are also some new method implementations that will be helpful for building OpenJDK and the usual bug fixes. Check out bugs targeted to 0.99.1 in GCC Bugzilla. > as a related topic, should an update of boehm-gc be addressed too? > > thanks, Matthias > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07