From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 64752 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2016 16:32:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 64722 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jul 2016 16:32:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (HELO gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com) (67.222.39.168) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with SMTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:32:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 29356 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jul 2016 16:32:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 12 Jul 2016 16:32:19 -0000 Received: from box522.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.122]) by cmgw4 with id HsYF1t00M2f2jeq01sYJt3; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:32:19 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=ecGuId0H c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=GsOEXm/OWkKvwdLVJsfwcA==:117 a=GsOEXm/OWkKvwdLVJsfwcA==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=PnD2wP_eR3oA:10 a=wTNNr4PC6uwA:10 a=cAmyUtKerLwA:10 a=r_1tXGB3AAAA:8 a=KCUbE9GEr8HFIzK1kBkA:9 a=dauzL-4doAwA:10 a=QRfbHetfyFQA:10 a=t8nPyN_e6usw4ciXM-Pk:22 Received: from [65.128.62.222] (port=60692 helo=bapiya) by box522.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bN0bW-0003Ps-Ps; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:32:15 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Matthew Fortune Cc: Tom Tromey , "java-patches\@gcc.gnu.org" , "'gcc-patches\@gcc.gnu.org' \(gcc-patches\@gcc.gnu.org\)" , "per\@bothner.com" , "aph\@redhat.com" , Aurelien Jarno Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix FFI return type for closures in the java interpreter References: <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B023537E45FD9F@HHMAIL01.hh.imgtec.org> <87shvyib1n.fsf@tromey.com> <8760stviqj.fsf@tromey.com> <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B023537E46241B@HHMAIL01.hh.imgtec.org> <87k2h9t3en.fsf@tromey.com> <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B023537E474A22@HHMAIL01.hh.imgtec.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B023537E474A22@HHMAIL01.hh.imgtec.org> (Matthew Fortune's message of "Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:20:06 +0000") Message-ID: <878tx6q0l1.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Identified-User: {36111:box522.bluehost.com:elynrobi:tromey.com} {sentby:smtp auth 65.128.62.222 authed with tom+tromey.com} X-Exim-ID: 1bN0bW-0003Ps-Ps X-Source-Sender: (bapiya) [65.128.62.222]:60692 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 0 X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTIyLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ== X-SW-Source: 2016-q3/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Fortune writes: Matthew> Sorry for the long delay... No problem. >> This is ok. >> Could you check? I think a -m32 build ought to show it. Maybe your >> x86-64 build already did this? Matthew> Still OK to commit? Yes, thanks. Tom