From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-patches-return-20317-listarch-java-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19230 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2011 13:41:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 19191 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2011 13:41:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-qy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.216.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:41:26 +0000
Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so2568441qyk.20        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 06:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.18.77 with SMTP id v13mr592053qca.56.1309354885369; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 06:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.214.83 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 06:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <yddoc1g3ilg.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
References: <yddd3hx59h6.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>	<BANLkTi=egX-2FJt0tU3o9rFZdK4kxKF2=Q@mail.gmail.com>	<yddoc1g3ilg.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:41:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=_+uGjc7kVDDh-cH+53Ff=fFKq0w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [testsuite, libffi] XFAIL libffi.call/cls_{,long}double_va.c on IRIX 6.5 (PR libffi/46660)
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Rainer Orth <ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, 	java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libffi-discuss@sourceware.org, 	Andreas Tobler <andreast@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-patches-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-q2/txt/msg00094.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Rainer Orth
<ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> The tests now fail on x86_64-linux and i?86-linux like
>>
>> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 7=
.0
>> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, =
is 7.0
>> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O2 output pattern test, is 7.0
>> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O2 output pattern test, is 7.0
>> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O3 output pattern test, is 7.0
>> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O3 output pattern test, is 7.0
>> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -Os output pattern test, is 7.0
>> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -Os output pattern test, is 7.0
>> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output patter=
n test,
>> is 7.0
>> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pa=
ttern te
>> st, is 7.0
>>
>> spawn [open ...]^M
>> 7.0
>> res: 4
>> 7.0
>> res: 4
>> PASS: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
>> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 7=
.0
>> res: 4
>> 7.0
>> res: 4
>> , should match PR libffi/466607.0^M?
>> res: 4^M?
>> 7.0^M?
>> res: 4
>>
>> I believe your dg-output first arguments are bogus.
>
> You're right, I'm an idiot ;-) =A0I should have tested on a non-xfailed
> target, too.
>
> Fixed as follows, tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and mips-sgi-irix6.5,
> applied to mainline and 4.6 branch. =A0The 4.5 branch is unaffected.
>
> Sorry.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Rainer
>
>
> 2011-06-29 =A0Rainer Orth =A0<ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* testsuite/libffi.call/cls_double_va.c: Move PR number to=
 comment.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* testsuite/libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c: Likewise.
>
> Index: libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_double_va.c
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> --- libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_double_va.c =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(revision=
 175618)
> +++ libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_double_va.c =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(working =
copy)
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
>
> =A0/* { dg-do run { xfail strongarm*-*-* xscale*-*-* } } */
> =A0/* { dg-output "" { xfail avr32*-*-* } } */
> -/* { dg-output "PR libffi/46660" { xfail mips-sgi-irix6* } } */
> +/* { dg-output "" { xfail mips-sgi-irix6* } } PR libffi/46660 */
> =A0/* { dg-skip-if "" arm*-*-* { "-mfloat-abi=3Dhard" } { "" } } */
>

Why not just add mips-sgi-irix6* to avr32*-*-*?

--=20
H.J.