From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24734 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2016 17:25:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24711 invoked by uid 89); 4 Oct 2016 17:25:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1553, D*comcast.net, HTo:D*comcast.net X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-lf0-f43.google.com Received: from mail-lf0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-lf0-f43.google.com) (209.85.215.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 17:25:47 +0000 Received: by mail-lf0-f43.google.com with SMTP id b81so71746489lfe.1; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 10:25:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LzvU7ibKCcacMZMSw3NnAqunzSRAEtIGgxregWDMLd8=; b=jNwV49oYhyjcAbF/ZvP16NbA4nB3wZqM4smg0mSatGIsPnDIs9hvBd81IfvxL7vPDe o2PJXXNBzjJwsaizeaVQg06eYL9Qg0BWKXedRFc12tPvzK3+2Gb1WDtRWvIVGcO1i7qH TweUrAKKQ4idgKp7j45P4/FTtDH2m/0Q5sBlWMzXxk7B2uzhaQiL5c4I3CVGfs8vzPm4 kFDTniC5aPwJgaNGVyob+eGcsZYjGUzFN56dqvx1gwi4CaqWWYvRJ5YmJv2PUZJ9V5/Y YsFb04qOjYWQTYy6BHvKbOP+R1wXrzIZqp+xndJRa5qO3fke3K8qIVyjZxWOSKmc70vb AwRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlmbC5E2+Gm1odDcDD+vFho1gU6DzvGoUa0X01SxmfiBlfYYAUnjthEjtn5KrL6YW4b06mJsQr1nx3Dbw== X-Received: by 10.46.33.98 with SMTP id h95mr991301ljh.53.1475601945241; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 10:25:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.166.76 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 10:25:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0E421C5A-7EF5-4182-A13B-BF9AEAF90215@comcast.net> References: <78f841e7-808b-58d0-7913-3ec0d19630a0@redhat.com> <4deb7e45-e428-d819-aabc-748abe8f7686@redhat.com> <0E421C5A-7EF5-4182-A13B-BF9AEAF90215@comcast.net> From: Andrew Pinski Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 17:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ To: Mike Stump Cc: Andrew Haley , Rainer Orth , Matthias Klose , GCC Patches , GCJ-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SW-Source: 2016-q4/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Oct 4, 2016, at 1:41 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: >> >> On 04/10/16 09:39, Rainer Orth wrote: >>> Hi Matthias, >>> >>>> On 05.09.2016 17:13, Andrew Haley wrote: >>>>> As discussed. I think I should ask a Global reviewer to approve this >>>>> one. For obvious reasons I haven't included the diffs to the deleted >>>>> gcc/java and libjava directories. The whole tree, post GCJ-deletion, >>>>> is at svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcj/gcj-deletion-branch >>>>> if anyone would like to try it. >>>> >>>> still breaks bootstraps when configured with --enable-objc-gc. >>>> >>>> the immediate step should be to fix the bootstrap failure, as an addit= ional step >>>> to remove boehm-gc from the gcc sources and be able to use an external= boehm-gc. >>> >>> the first part is handled by my unreviewed patch >>> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg02437.html >> >> Looks obvious to me, fixes bootstrap. I think no-one will complain >> if you check it in. > > I don't know who wants to review it, but if people want me to, Ok. The i= dea is that if ObjC is the last remaining user in tree for boehm-gc, then r= easonably I'm the last man standing. Of course, if others want to review a= pprove the patch, I'm fine with that. =46rom a runtime maintainer position, I am also fine with this patch. > > I'm fine with patches to externalize boehm-gc if people want to push that= direction. I am also ok with that too. Thanks, Andrew >