From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-patches-return-20610-listarch-java-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31026 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2012 12:01:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 31014 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2012 12:01:48 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_BF
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f180.google.com) (209.85.214.180)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:01:45 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id wd20so1836381obb.39        for <java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:01:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20120113;        h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;        bh=16u6sCQ99cKrmhkUGH3l0pIQNYi3u/wleQFmZe5/lAs=;        b=ZGVWAw9F3glHq9ezeSIdwQPyF2bIU4YLNO1E4KdX2bl4i3RE3tuWUXhOKZ+Urp+shP         I1MliwtmKvsbLeR2pjv/81o0a9W2pkUtv8xLLdUGAIowdVOhu+aQ3V50WPuNyRKw9TTu         8Db2jdz0/03j3IwRvzLNHUU66oG6oSMssOi4Lj8WVEN6Yl5oMDykqbmKuw+h97wMZmcV         Z2PY0j77nf/EuKY9478WLRC+SQpbpUIKoPVK/JAwa6uY6MpS67goRynBfnXTSIYIp2ZA         vQydZ4UITZOPz5z7Db3UVGhx67N/XLYGHhPD5BsSGwp9CT7qoNeD+14sSKnfoZLz42c1         AKGQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.171.112 with SMTP id at16mr4513726oec.47.1355918503433; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:01:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.109.50 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:01:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50C612EA.8080607@redhat.com>
References: <50C60CFF.50408@ubuntu.com>	<50C612EA.8080607@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:01:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CACxje58Wj-rvWksQ7aPnY1DO2GPU62FU5uJSfHP8u6cQwAExVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: please merge libffi trunk into GCC
From: Anthony Green <green@moxielogic.com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>, GCJ-patches <java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@arm.com>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlHrQTwd0Vaj7iptzH1sBbYazt2SAEDuORyEwSQ6y8Io2nBuvLHwLPZHLpk3TXKLDXImL6W
Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-patches-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-q4/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/10/2012 04:25 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> I assume such a merge would require approval by the java maintainers.
>
> Fine by me.
>
> Andrew.
>

I've been away and just started on a merge.  I should have a patch
ready later today.

AG