From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4935 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2012 21:02:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 4923 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Apr 2012 21:01:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_BF X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 21:01:39 +0000 Received: by wgbed3 with SMTP id ed3so2101560wgb.8 for ; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:01:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=PDUk4/bAajfJY+qPFDSCsIPgtFCKmSXw8DZwnbTmMNI=; b=db9l8rHDjj8SDEMUCOeIGDD1Fr4tYZVJzhc1tFHt0nhnA1IAYQefCc5NSJYos2EG4m zv2/QtTE/6r5RoUPC+IkH5fntXABdsUpnzZY1M7XlSNDn6g+BliPMmyHrHXjofhpy09x gKGk3hggonY2e869+JyJytA2sWV6tMv4B15i0e95Fg6UkcSqKz07piuvhzl94dWWUGxr Y/jPaDLayXWzbtRGef7A3fO8dQq+Kwa3m8jHi1p3YA8EXmc2cn1GdCtaqZxNXNY81oj6 z6f6eRbr8y6HhQuNqwryDlHD5zMSUWVziR1CMa543qas1DBcwOSe0GRGBT+uU95rxF3c tMWA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.85.69 with SMTP id f5mr14214914wiz.18.1333746098563; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.54.74 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 14:01:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F7F5233.7060508@ubuntu.com> References: <4F7F5233.7060508@ubuntu.com> Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 21:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please help test libffi 3.0.11-rc3 From: Anthony Green To: Matthias Klose Cc: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org, David Gilbert , GCJ-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmpWaB5zDW8Nu5rEM4BVyjRE7GGkIVCX8NDIT6vHPfQvJBbZyKRAYomJHcoLoo/zP5xGVMY Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q2/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > I see that some of the armhf-variadic patches are not applied, attached. > =A0Please could you confirm if dropping these changes is deliberate? Could you please double check this? I see that the two test case tweaks are missing, but the third patch fragment seems wrong. src/arc/ffi.c does include ffi_prep_cif_machdep_var(). AG