From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 101672 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2016 12:00:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101593 invoked by uid 89); 10 Sep 2016 12:00:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=gcj-deletion, sk:gcj-del, sk:gcjdel, aph@redhat.com X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-yw0-f178.google.com Received: from mail-yw0-f178.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f178.google.com) (209.85.161.178) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 12:00:15 +0000 Received: by mail-yw0-f178.google.com with SMTP id g192so61548055ywh.1; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 05:00:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GMPgkb9o4uB6jQi1u4dGQIkDgmoY8pdEHZkspHU8epE=; b=PPq+1+fPdJWY7q9fOMpv3E0ihr9VPE1CSIOnVJCqO6tXmkzSLcSO+ifZ95nxbNKF8B lSV9DIA4Z+W27UciIZmoBkPWo8eRF0mrijlRLXdRwGdDh1oLLsHI5yUr7reuBMzoXaWz CGkw5vHVVIGw6cYqemK93p8Eu5gETA5XEDroVmc1qLfW19xomkZ+fICr0T2vQATetAGb jfO5XT1YE+0CkJvR0cAauWDNOsTAu2AoUO4uxkE8VXuNCrpOUnzQOGqW2JPkwiCnMw05 jdchcwQ8ip4Tjm8wzBRk4F8xyKuBqtFXAOoGmhaIRN2Mn00EU7qThax/qqJP0vDSaYaA VoWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNtbLVzsAgMuGoiog9NpI1AtpgnTEkCD8LD1eIHR0nt14ECR19Vcdtx3QfQ98Mkr34/fIbDU+vjAduPfg== X-Received: by 10.129.115.138 with SMTP id o132mr7211333ywc.152.1473508804730; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 05:00:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.230.73 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 04:59:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <78f841e7-808b-58d0-7913-3ec0d19630a0@redhat.com> References: <78f841e7-808b-58d0-7913-3ec0d19630a0@redhat.com> From: NightStrike Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 12:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ To: Andrew Haley Cc: GCC Patches , GCJ-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2016-q3/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > As discussed. I think I should ask a Global reviewer to approve this > one. For obvious reasons I haven't included the diffs to the deleted > gcc/java and libjava directories. The whole tree, post GCJ-deletion, > is at svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcj/gcj-deletion-branch > if anyone would like to try it. > > Andrew. For what little (to nothing) it's worth, I still use gcj, and I like the ease of adding small bits of java to a project without involving additional compilers. It optimizes extremely well, is easy to use, and adds to the completeness of the GNU Compiler *Collection*. Could we at least reach out and see if there's someone else who could be the maintainer? I noticed gcj patches recently, so there's still interest.