From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-patches-return-20544-listarch-java-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27236 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2012 17:47:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 27130 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jul 2012 17:47:36 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:47:22 +0000
Received: by pbbrq2 with SMTP id rq2so2954152pbb.20        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.238.68 with SMTP id vi4mr871535pbc.123.1342633642156; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.11.130 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5006F3AD.5000601@redhat.com>
References: <20120716210441.GA5620@intel.com>	<20120718163007.GA23495@intel.com>	<5006F3AD.5000601@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:47:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFULd4aWPnM9630tBsUd_yZ5cQN3sR1BzEmOA=OAFbbkz_cfag@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PR libjava/53973: Check and and skip 67h address size prefix for x32
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, 	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-patches-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-q3/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 05:30 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> 2012-07-16  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>>
>>       PR libjava/53973
>>       * include/x86_64-signal.h (CHECK_67H_PREFIX): New.
>>       (HANDLE_DIVIDE_OVERFLOW): Check and and skip 67h address size
>>       prefix if CHECK_67H_PREFIX is 1.  Use ULL suffix for 64-bit
>>       integer.
>
> OK.  I would have thought it was OK to skip the 67h address size
> whether or not it was x32, though.

You can just skip the prefix unconditionally.

Uros.