From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3190 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2016 09:06:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3156 invoked by uid 89); 6 Sep 2016 09:06:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:965, deleting X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-wm0-f49.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f49.google.com) (74.125.82.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 09:06:38 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id 1so177074275wmz.1; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 02:06:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sb5EYQFXoBhBAtr32mxe58GvNxjZhzBpEt6Fnz2iR+I=; b=aGbJain+W28hjYJV+9L2rsT8ydiZjgpd9NWkxZW30I4cTZT7UIz8Me200GOcLXZ4v1 StoQUyfXKZncA3Y05RnJ54AOGa1KHHI/mR/mzEAHCnQ4mUkH/7zg0a7oEN9hPz0thBH/ 5hU+yJ7VjUaNZ1Q2yYqr6Z2wArvLupfOTBWOMD1Y5qj2xl4A06hWUDZ0fVq64cu+tHg0 qSENiJODNK487t1IU3nwJ4Y5tPsXxy1RhPQe8Yc2L6DLIQa62dLewGvAIA3zLHIJYgib WspXWIAFmLa/PlOBIt3pYGTdXuRxYGx0AtK3bOk2NpfjN6LZXX2VyGO5RUh0UHxMGMzF xhjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMb5ekoR8JRpJkPABTlK7wrvE6x8jCWGootC5eRYXCwGOluSH1IuaLngPFm9dHuuz1zEnVkRdAh/+LVXg== X-Received: by 10.28.139.144 with SMTP id n138mr18529289wmd.71.1473152796782; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 02:06:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.137.202 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 02:06:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <68b0da2b-6f38-cde4-72a9-1cf42a629996@redhat.com> References: <78f841e7-808b-58d0-7913-3ec0d19630a0@redhat.com> <68b0da2b-6f38-cde4-72a9-1cf42a629996@redhat.com> From: Richard Biener Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 09:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ To: Andrew Haley Cc: GCC Patches , GCJ-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2016-q3/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 05/09/16 17:15, Richard Biener wrote: >> On September 5, 2016 5:13:06 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew Haley wrote: >>> As discussed. I think I should ask a Global reviewer to approve this >>> one. For obvious reasons I haven't included the diffs to the deleted >>> gcc/java and libjava directories. The whole tree, post GCJ-deletion, >>> is at svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcj/gcj-deletion-branch >>> if anyone would like to try it. >> >> Isn't there also java specific C++ frontend parts? > > There certainly are, but deleting them without breaking anything else > is going to be rather delicate. I'm trying to do this one step at a > time, rather cautiously. Ok, that sounds reasonable. You have my approval for this first part then. Please wait until after the GNU Cauldron to allow other global reviewers to object. Thanks, Richard. > Andrew.