From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 40296 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2015 16:24:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 40282 invoked by uid 89); 12 Aug 2015 16:24:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-oi0-f48.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:24:08 +0000 Received: by oihn130 with SMTP id n130so11801818oih.2 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:24:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=KjThU7Ik9vjm5PKNRyi+V0gy9yF4/tnQwm543V1M/5U=; b=ckFg+yiliA7ySDtwo+HJWHnh637rZQMOwckfRTT1G1o94h18mAWQAR76mPCPKk5JfJ /n11eCJmWhrUvbXpM9f2qGTeh/QLbtPubNnbLIfAHMIylaw4uBBWis5h3qRMSixVfV3k hr7TQYZnjsCmcYxDKZaeRe8oo5U6MATBRuxGoTstiP13A4+YqGZ70J5qbJRNiXS3xow2 ODLClaLqbeEBbfzayrmjqWn80wsB2dg5chqy6Q/6AXoxY85B1UwpCIiO4uhKN/Ai/CFf t3nsN6L7mvDfgRU9PBA2UQ3NXlV5Oyi0J1z8rYx3YLmwMup7PCdy8xCMfU1ds7SRtepP OtAw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQluWLOreFYmSfXEqCEGdnQf4ocbJBhz+NQLuVy7VshL1khhCtqu3zChmy1iBrLuc3SeJ7aq MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.168.149 with SMTP id r143mr30062612oie.44.1439396646105; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:24:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.80.6 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:24:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <871tf81nrk.fsf@tromey.com> References: <55CA44C8.7000209@redhat.com> <87mvxxdxys.fsf@tromey.com> <55CB5BB7.4090703@redhat.com> <871tf81nrk.fsf@tromey.com> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH, libjava/classpath]: Fix overriding recipe for target 'gjdoc' build warning From: Ian Lance Taylor To: Tom Tromey Cc: Jeff Law , Uros Bizjak , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , GCJ-patches , Andrew Haley Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2015-q3/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: > Jeff> In the past this has stalled on issues like how will asynch-exceptions > Jeff> be tested and the like. > > It seems to me that either there is some other language which needs this > -- in which case that language ought to have testing for the feature -- > or the feature is only used by gcj, in which case it doesn't matter. > > Of course is!=ought; but relying on gcj and libjava to provide this > small amount of testing seems like a bad cost/benefit tradeoff. Go does use asynchronous exceptions, and has test cases that rely on them working. Ian