From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16834 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2012 10:47:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 16824 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Mar 2012 10:47:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_IB X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:47:31 +0000 Received: by obqv19 with SMTP id v19so5472938obq.20 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 03:47:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.202.68 with SMTP id kg4mr23855107obc.42.1332758850688; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 03:47:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.60.199 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 03:47:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1332756668.2848.30.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> References: <4F70306B.5090607@redhat.com> <1332756668.2848.30.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [cp-patches] Fix libjava bootstrap failure around IUCLC From: Pekka Enberg To: Mark Wielaard Cc: Andrew Haley , classpath-patches@gnu.org, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q1/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 10:01 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 03/25/2012 05:08 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> > 2012-03-25 =A0Gerald Pfeifer =A0 >> > >> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 PR libgcj/52694 >> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * java/io/natVMConsole.cc (IUCLC): Define, if undefine= d. >> >> Sure. =A0WTF is IUCLC anyway? =A0:-) > > (map) Input (characters) UpperCase (to) Lower Case. > It is a non-posix termios extension. > > patch should also go into upstream classpath. Yes, please. Btw, why are people not fixing GNU Classpath upstream-first?