From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5366 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2009 18:57:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 5344 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2009 18:57:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net (HELO vms173005pub.verizon.net) (206.46.173.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:57:09 +0000 Received: from [172.16.1.71] ([68.163.213.174]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KKX00IUZOK9PI30@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net>; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:55:27 -0500 (CDT) Cc: Andrew Haley , tromey@redhat.com, Ralf Wildenhues , Andreas Tobler , Dave Korn , Anthony Green , Anthony Green , libffi-discuss@sourceware.org, gcc-patches , Java Patch List Message-id: From: Timothy Wall To: NightStrike In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: libffi merge Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:57:00 -0000 References: <4A27F4BB.2070902@gmail.com> <4A2954AA.1050404@fgznet.ch> <4A2957A8.4080309@redhat.com> <4A2A26F8.7050304@redhat.com> <20090607064416.GF8969@gmx.de> <4A2D3DAA.503@redhat.com> <4A2D43AD.8090307@redhat.com> Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q2/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 The patches Nightstrike is referring to implement win64 support with mingw. I'll probably need to regenerate them; I sent two patches to gcc- patches/java-patches, but I don't think the first ever showed up (it changed all closure tests in the testsuite to use ffi_closure_alloc instead of stack-based memory). I'd prefer to generate the patch against libffi CVS, since I can test that one standalone. On Jun 8, 2009, at 1:58 PM, NightStrike wrote: > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: >> NightStrike wrote: >> >>> On a side note, when do you plan on updating everything with Timothy >>> Wall's patch? >> >> If you can point me at a URL which describes this patch then I can >> tell >> you. Timothy Wall has written a few patches. > > I guess he'd be the best person to ask. > > Tim, where is your latest patch for libffi to support win64?