From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 104860 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2016 19:04:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 104842 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jan 2016 19:04:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=isn, life X-HELO: resqmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net Received: from resqmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.164) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 19:04:10 +0000 Received: from resomta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.226]) by resqmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id 1X441s0044tLnxL01X48Gt; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 19:04:08 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:2001:558:6045:a4:40c6:7199:cd03:b02d] ([IPv6:2001:558:6045:a4:40c6:7199:cd03:b02d]) by resomta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id 1X461s00M2ztT3H01X470k; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 19:04:08 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [patch] [java] bump libgcj soname From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: <56895B88.60504@ubuntu.com> Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 19:04:00 -0000 Cc: Andrew Haley , Jakub Jelinek , GCJ-patches , "gcc-patches@gnu.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <55365991.4030806@ubuntu.com> <20150421141125.GW1725@tucnak.redhat.com> <55365BB2.4080603@ubuntu.com> <20150421141924.GX1725@tucnak.redhat.com> <55365EE0.8070202@ubuntu.com> <20150421143747.GY1725@tucnak.redhat.com> <5687E158.7000401@ubuntu.com> <5687EF4D.5030304@redhat.com> <5687F269.7030109@ubuntu.com> <5687F698.20106@redhat.com> <56890829.4020601@ubuntu.com> <56892D5F.1050301@redhat.com> <568943AC.20108@ubuntu.com> <56894AFC.5040608@redhat.com> <56895B88.60504@ubuntu.com> To: Matthias Klose X-SW-Source: 2016-q1/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 On Jan 3, 2016, at 9:34 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 03.01.2016 17:23, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 03/01/16 15:52, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> No, libgcj versions up to 4.9.3 didn't change the value for releases ta= ken from >>> the same branch. All of 4.9.0, 4.9.1, 4.9.2, 4.9.3 have the same >>> GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSION. But 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 have *different* GCJ_CXX_ABI_= VERSIONs. >>>=20 >>>>> Why change this rule now, at this stage of GCJ's life? >>> This was changed by the change of the version schema, an unintential ch= ange for >>> GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSION. I want to keep it that way, not change it with ev= ery >>> release from the gcc-5 branch. >>=20 >> Because effectively we've done an arithmetic shift left on the GCC versi= on >> numbering, I guess? So where we would have had 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, we = now >> have 5.1, 5.2, 5.3? >=20 > yes, exactly. But, isn=92t there a trunk version of this patch? I mean, the same issue a= pplies to it and gcc 6, gcc 7 and gcc 8, no?