From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17478 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2006 19:15:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 17469 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Oct 2006 19:15:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com (HELO ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com) (24.94.166.115) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 19:15:06 +0000 Received: from d9300 (CPE-65-30-191-92.wi.res.rr.com [65.30.191.92]) by ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k96JF1kK010475; Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:15:03 -0500 (CDT) From: Mohan Embar To: Marco Trudel Cc: Ranjit Mathew , Java Patch List Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 19:15:00 -0000 Reply-To: gnustuff@thisiscool.com In-Reply-To: <452672BE.2040806@gmx.ch> Message-Id: Subject: Re: regression: [MinGW] Slightly More Robust Stacktraces on Windows MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Opera 6.05 build 1140 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q4/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 Hi Marco, >I now got it working by reverting the latest three patches that were >applied to backtrace.h. >The question now is what to do. I don't think we can leave it broken, do >we? I currently don't have the time to debug and fix that myself, but I >could provide you the failing example (it's one line of code). >Or is it better to remove the patch? If you can, create a Bugzilla entry for this. You never know. -- Mohan http://www.thisiscool.com/ http://www.animalsong.org/