From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7138 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2008 00:09:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 7122 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jan 2008 00:09:39 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:09:12 +0000 Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DF93917E; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:09:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:09:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: David Daney , Andrew Haley cc: Tom Tromey , java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] libjava: Add option to disable BC ABI in libgcj. In-Reply-To: <479C5E29.6000607@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <476C3D6A.6060704@avtrex.com> <479AC29F.9050909@avtrex.com> <479B1090.9090307@redhat.com> <479BAB00.2000202@avtrex.com> <479C5E29.6000607@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, David Daney wrote: >> See ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/summit/2004/GCJ%20New%20ABI.pdf > While I could certainly reference this paper, I am not sure that install.texi > is the best place for such a reference. > > I was thinking that if someone wanted to know the gory details, they could > look up -findirect-dispatch. I was trying to keep the install documentation > as small as possible while still describing what the new option does. Fair enough. Should that link be added to gcj.texi, then? On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Andrew Haley wrote: >> I don't think so, but I have a limited grasp of the English language. I >> will defer to others on which of 'affected' or 'effected' should be used >> here. > OK, so take it from me: it's "affected". ;-) David, I assume Andrew is going to give the final Ack for the patch (or has done so already). Just make sure you won't stall on me, I was mainly trying to give some feedback. Gerald