From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 39267 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2017 17:17:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 39215 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jan 2017 17:17:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:sk:java-pa, HTo:U*java-patches, interest X-HELO: aibo.runbox.com Received: from aibo.runbox.com (HELO aibo.runbox.com) (91.220.196.211) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 17:17:22 +0000 Received: from [10.9.9.211] (helo=mailfront11.runbox.com) by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVLlX-00006B-Fp for java-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 18:17:19 +0100 Received: from 70-36-239-8.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com ([70.36.239.8] helo=localhost.localdomain) by mailfront11.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:757155 ) (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) id 1cVLlA-0006oY-L2 for java-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 18:16:56 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ To: java-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <78f841e7-808b-58d0-7913-3ec0d19630a0@redhat.com> <610ea470-7197-2f55-1fee-23f89a443460@redhat.com> From: Per Bothner Message-ID: Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 17:17:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-q1/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 On 01/22/2017 08:51 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016, Andrew Haley wrote: >>> Note I did not include all the removed java/* contents. Is there >>> anything particular you'd like to retain there? >> No, please delete it all. > > Okay, so I (finally) went ahead and removed all of java/papers: I don't think those should have been deleted. There may be links to them, and they may be historical interest. -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/