From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 118269 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2016 11:41:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 118234 invoked by uid 89); 7 Sep 2016 11:41:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1281, deleting, surprise X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: foss.arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (HELO foss.arm.com) (217.140.101.70) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 11:41:09 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89241A5E; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 04:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e105689-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e105689-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.2.207.32]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62F3B3F21A; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 04:41:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ To: Jeff Law , Jakub Jelinek , Richard Biener References: <78f841e7-808b-58d0-7913-3ec0d19630a0@redhat.com> <68b0da2b-6f38-cde4-72a9-1cf42a629996@redhat.com> <20160906090831.GD14857@tucnak.redhat.com> <1323d2ff-261d-4623-e61e-543f47b824c8@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Haley , GCC Patches , GCJ-patches From: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 11:41:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1323d2ff-261d-4623-e61e-543f47b824c8@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-q3/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 On 06/09/16 22:17, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/06/2016 03:08 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:06:36AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: >>>> On 05/09/16 17:15, Richard Biener wrote: >>>>> On September 5, 2016 5:13:06 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew Haley >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> As discussed. I think I should ask a Global reviewer to approve this >>>>>> one. For obvious reasons I haven't included the diffs to the deleted >>>>>> gcc/java and libjava directories. The whole tree, post GCJ-deletion, >>>>>> is at svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcj/gcj-deletion-branch >>>>>> if anyone would like to try it. >>>>> >>>>> Isn't there also java specific C++ frontend parts? >>>> >>>> There certainly are, but deleting them without breaking anything else >>>> is going to be rather delicate. I'm trying to do this one step at a >>>> time, rather cautiously. >>> >>> Ok, that sounds reasonable. >>> >>> You have my approval for this first part then. Please wait until >>> after the >>> GNU Cauldron to allow other global reviewers to object. >> >> No objection from me. > No objection from me either (I'm guessing that's not a surprise). > Nor from me. R. > jeff