From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18541 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2012 19:48:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 18532 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Mar 2012 19:48:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,TW_IB X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:48:07 +0000 Received: from [192.168.152.108] (unknown [41.160.154.132]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B38E93F41F; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:48:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:48:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Andrew Haley cc: java-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Fix libjava bootstrap failure around IUCLC In-Reply-To: <4F70498A.8030707@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <4F70306B.5090607@redhat.com> <1332756668.2848.30.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> <4F70498A.8030707@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q1/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2 On Mon, 26 Mar 2012, Andrew Haley wrote: >>>>>> 2012-03-25 Gerald Pfeifer >>>>>> >>>>>> PR libgcj/52694 >>>>>> * java/io/natVMConsole.cc (IUCLC): Define, if undefined. >> patch should also go into upstream classpath. > Yes, definitely. Gerald, do you have a classpath ID? If > not, I'll do it. Thanks for the offer, Andrew. I do not have upstream commit access, so if you can take care of that it'll be great. (And thanks for including me on the thread, I was surprised to see no responses on gcc-patches, and read java-patches online now. ;-) Gerald