From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7522 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2012 15:15:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 7457 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Nov 2012 15:15:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,TW_GC X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:14:14 +0000 Received: from [10.24.247.199] (unknown [12.110.94.2]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8170C3F40F; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:14:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:15:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Andrew Hughes cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [wwwdocs,Java] comparison of libgcj with Kaffe link is gone In-Reply-To: <2045336843.908998.1352942779960.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <2045336843.908998.1352942779960.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q4/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Andrew Hughes wrote: >> --- status.html 1 Nov 2011 14:07:02 -0000 1.31 >> +++ status.html 1 Nov 2012 22:16:48 -0000 >> -

You can also see a >> -comparison of libgcj with the JDK. This is updated nightly. It >> -is run against the cvs trunk, and includes GNU Crypto in its analysis. >> -This is the most up-to-date analysis of API differences.

> I'd have to look at the context of this, but (assuming I can actually > get my webserver to stay up reliably) I have more up-to-date comparisons > on there, comparing OpenJDK with GNU Classpath. GCJ could easily be added > and listed in the docs. Absolutely, if you can have a reliable link, I'd be happy to see this added. Gerald