From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 124122 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2016 20:32:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 124093 invoked by uid 89); 16 Apr 2016 20:32:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=concerns, Hx-languages-length:682, nearly, life X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 20:32:03 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.5] (vie-188-118-253-246.dsl.sil.at [188.118.253.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A5F23F479; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:31:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 20:32:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Andrew Hughes cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [wwwdocs,Java] java/index.html -- fix formatting on gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <1384476119.20974246.1460325515495.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <1384476119.20974246.1460325515495.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2016-q2/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Andrew Hughes wrote: >> That said, looking at the page, and how since 2005 nearly all changes >> have been maintainance ones from me, is it really worthwhile keeping >> this (short of historic reasons)? > I guess the next news will be the removal of GCJ during the > GCC 7 development period, so its remaining shelf life should > be limited anyway. Soo, GCC 6 has branched -- would it make sense for you guys to start this removal? Somewhat related, any concerns if I were to remove https://gcc.gnu.org/java/status.html now? ("Status of GCJ as of GCC 3.2" _really_ is rather old.) Gerald