From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 82222 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2017 15:23:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 82033 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jan 2017 15:23:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:23:16 +0000 Received: from anthias (vie-188-118-248-047.dsl.sil.at [188.118.248.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F7C93F530; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 10:23:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:23:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener cc: java-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [libgcc] i386/cygming-crtbegin.c: remove LIBGCJ_SONAME Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2017-q1/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 Not a regression in the strict sense, but a left over from the Java removal. Can we still get that in? (I think I pretty much committed all other changes of things I found as left overs from the GCJ/libgcj removal.) Gerald 2017-01-20 Gerald Pfeifer * config/i386/cygming-crtbegin.c (LIBGCJ_SONAME): No longer #define. Index: libgcc/config/i386/cygming-crtbegin.c =================================================================== --- libgcc/config/i386/cygming-crtbegin.c (revision 244714) +++ libgcc/config/i386/cygming-crtbegin.c (working copy) @@ -42,10 +42,6 @@ #define LIBGCC_SONAME "libgcc_s.dll" #endif -#ifndef LIBGCJ_SONAME -#define LIBGCJ_SONAME "libgcj_s.dll" -#endif - #if DWARF2_UNWIND_INFO /* Make the declarations weak. This is critical for _Jv_RegisterClasses because it lives in libgcj.a */