From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 124249 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2016 16:28:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 124230 invoked by uid 89); 5 Oct 2016 16:28:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 16:28:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2110AC04B926; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 16:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-116-162.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.162]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u95GS6ae006888; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 12:28:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ To: Iain Sandoe , Rainer Orth References: <78f841e7-808b-58d0-7913-3ec0d19630a0@redhat.com> <4deb7e45-e428-d819-aabc-748abe8f7686@redhat.com> <0E421C5A-7EF5-4182-A13B-BF9AEAF90215@comcast.net> <6DA7C7D0-314E-4A5E-8B35-5A8EA2F74CD8@mentor.com> Cc: Andrew Haley , Matthias Klose , GCC Patches , GCJ-patches , Mike Stump From: Jeff Law Message-ID: Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 16:28:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6DA7C7D0-314E-4A5E-8B35-5A8EA2F74CD8@mentor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-q4/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 On 10/04/2016 12:39 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote: >> >> I don't know who wants to review it, but if people want me to, Ok. The idea is that if ObjC is the last remaining user in tree for boehm-gc, then reasonably I'm the last man standing. Of course, if others want to review approve the patch, I'm fine with that. >> >> I'm fine with patches to externalize boehm-gc if people want to push that direction. > > +1 Works for me as well, particularly since we've been horrible at updating boehm-gc. I think the in-tree version is something like 10 years old at this point -- and there's been over a dozen upstream releases since we last sync'd. Jeff