From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21733 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2007 15:40:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 21724 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jan 2007 15:40:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:40:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0JFeb5p003844 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:40:37 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l0JFeab2005740 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:40:36 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ton.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.15]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l0JFeUPN013476; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:40:31 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id DDAB2508C50; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:31:18 -0700 (MST) To: Keith Seitz Cc: Andrew Haley , Java Patch List Subject: Re: [RFA] Add JDWP VM_INIT JVMTI callback References: <45AC7341.40004@redhat.com> <45B00A27.5010002@gmx.ch> <17840.2865.547405.103276@zebedee.pink> <45B01F61.7010606@redhat.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:40:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <45B01F61.7010606@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00105.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz writes: Keith> Any suggestions on how to clean these long lines up better or is this Keith> sufficient? I think this is sufficient. It is also ok if the occasional line goes over 80 chars. Tom