From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-patches-return-20375-listarch-java-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10977 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2011 16:10:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 10955 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Aug 2011 16:10:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:10:24 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7AGAN84003107	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:10:24 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7AGANSO006739;	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:10:23 -0400
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7AGALAx023816;	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:10:22 -0400
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Jie Liu <lj8175@gmail.com>
Cc: java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,        Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [JAVA] Double.parseDouble(null) throw NullPointerException
References: <CABc96T_0THd_tKzdHSjD-xcPd7=dqoFkr0aRwrdvx-h4s2Hnxg@mail.gmail.com>	<CABc96T_DNYxNsqKqdsVw7-x8uVc05_fB0BcHfJU5rv-VtFUv7A@mail.gmail.com>	<m3zkjkugz9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CABc96T_dL8gN9LwtE+Gb_WuzAv1XvCaU+rbZkxhNb-Wb=EdBJw@mail.gmail.com>	<m339hatrqv.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CABc96T-R-TY=T0KrnedV0hSyhLoa1=vuc_P9jwJ_gmEz4QjfJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:41:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CABc96T-R-TY=T0KrnedV0hSyhLoa1=vuc_P9jwJ_gmEz4QjfJg@mail.gmail.com>	(Jie Liu's message of "Wed, 10 Aug 2011 23:11:07 +0800")
Message-ID: <m3bovxqmc2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-patches-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-q3/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Jie" == Jie Liu <lj8175@gmail.com> writes:

Jie> +  *-*-rtems*)
Jie> +	can_unwind_signal=no
Jie> +	CHECKREFSPEC=-fcheck-references
Jie> +	DIVIDESPEC=-fuse-divide-subroutine
Jie> +	;;

This part is OK with a ChangeLog entry.

Jie> +

Spurious newline addition.

Jie> But it does not work as we want, is there something wrong?

Did you rebuild all of libgcj?

If you did, then I don't know, you'll have to debug it, sorry.

I vaguely recollect that -fcheck-references adds a check for 'this' at
the start of final methods.  If I'm misremembering, then that is
probably the problem.

Tom