From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27614 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2007 02:01:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 27602 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2007 02:01:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:01:03 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1E2112B023898; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:01:01 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1E211NQ027323; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:01:01 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ton.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.15]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1E20xds013938; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:00:59 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E32F337833C; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:48:42 -0700 (MST) To: gnustuff@thisiscool.com Cc: GCJ-patches Subject: Re: Patch: RFC: fix ProcessBuilder; windows help needed References: <3Y5Y1VUP821VJDZXRYXUT2UTPE907UQ.45d26be7@parallels> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3Y5Y1VUP821VJDZXRYXUT2UTPE907UQ.45d26be7@parallels> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00455.txt.bz2 Mohan> I think I found the problem. I was configuring with an old Mohan> script without --enable-java-maintainer-mode because my paths Mohan> were messed up. Sorry for the confusion and that I made you do Mohan> a whole new build. Serves me right for doing this in a Mohan> distracted manner.... No problem. I'm relieved to hear it isn't a bug in our build. Mohan> I want to take another stab at figuring this out on my end. I'm Mohan> redoing the build. Stay tuned. I also have another (simpler) patch, in a different area, that I would like you to try when you have a moment. In this case I made the windows changes as well (the change is trivial), but I wanted to make sure it built before going ahead. Tom