From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24698 invoked by alias); 30 May 2007 18:08:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 24690 invoked by uid 22791); 30 May 2007 18:08:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 May 2007 18:08:53 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4UI8nDh001240; Wed, 30 May 2007 14:08:49 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4UI8ncl021610; Wed, 30 May 2007 14:08:49 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ton.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.15]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4UI8jEi018167; Wed, 30 May 2007 14:08:47 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id B0C37379980; Wed, 30 May 2007 11:47:56 -0600 (MDT) To: Andrew Haley Cc: David Daney , java-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Eww: Modifier.INTERPRETED overload References: <18013.40545.855887.550863@zebedee.pink> <465DB4AF.1040804@avtrex.com> <18013.46998.246181.128792@zebedee.pink> <18013.47392.302058.43107@zebedee.pink> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 19:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <18013.47392.302058.43107@zebedee.pink> (Andrew Haley's message of "Wed\, 30 May 2007 18\:49\:20 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.990 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00262.txt.bz2 Andrew> I'm still minded to use my patch on active branches, though. Yeah, I think we have to, since a change in Class requires an ABI bump. Tom