From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9260 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2013 07:08:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9242 invoked by uid 89); 15 Apr 2013 07:08:24 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients Received: from cantor2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:08:23 +0000 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711C3A3A49; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:08:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Andrew Haley Cc: java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable java for aarch64 References: <516A8BDB.6000305@redhat.com> X-Yow: I wonder if I should put myself in ESCROW!! Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <516A8BDB.6000305@redhat.com> (Andrew Haley's message of "Sun, 14 Apr 2013 11:58:35 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-q2/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 Andrew Haley writes: > Looks basically OK. What were the failures, though? FAIL: TestClosureGC run FAIL: Array_3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: Array_3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: Array_3 -O3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: Array_3 -O3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: Invoke_1 execution - source compiled test FAIL: Invoke_1 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: Invoke_1 -O3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: Invoke_1 -O3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: PR218 execution - source compiled test FAIL: PR218 -O3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: StackTrace2 execution - source compiled test FAIL: StackTrace2 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: Throw_2 execution - source compiled test FAIL: Throw_2 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: Throw_2 -O3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: Throw_2 -O3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: Throw_3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: Throw_3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: Throw_3 -O3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: Throw_3 -O3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: pr83 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: pr83 -O3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: sourcelocation output - source compiled test FAIL: sourcelocation -findirect-dispatch output - source compiled test FAIL: sourcelocation -O3 output - source compiled test FAIL: sourcelocation -O3 -findirect-dispatch output - source compiled test Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."