From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25295 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2012 16:10:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 25278 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2012 16:10:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_BF,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from snape.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:09:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAD3EB4; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:09:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bH25yvxFCtKx; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:09:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E7B5EB3; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:09:33 +0100 (CET) Received: (from ro@localhost) by manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5/Submit) id q09G9W67009422; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:09:32 +0100 (MET) From: Rainer Orth To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Anthony Green , Richard Henderson , Richard Guenther , "Joseph S. Myers" Subject: Unreviewed^3 libffi patch Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact java-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q1/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 The following patch has remained unreviewed for almost a month now, despite two reminders: [libffi] Build 64-bit multilib for i?86-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg01011.html In the absence of a listed libffi maintainer (Anthony Green used to be listed in MAINTAINERS, but isn't anymore despite still taking care of upstream libffi), it probably needs a global reviewer. Thanks. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University