From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13766 invoked by alias); 21 May 2004 21:19:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13742 invoked by uid 48); 21 May 2004 21:19:18 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 21:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040521211918.13740.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040521210313.15576.mckinlay@redhat.com> References: <20040521210313.15576.mckinlay@redhat.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/15576] Class initialization optimization is disabled X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00128.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-21 21:19 ------- Confirmed, could we make another attribute which says that it only touches the memory passed into the function and it is okay to remove if the agruments are the same as it will not do anything else, this will also help fortran's "pure" functions too. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-05-21 21:19:17 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15576