public inbox for java-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/15813] [3.5 Regression] Throw_2 test case does not work anymore.
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 20:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040605201327.11727.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040603214800.15813.andreast@gcc.gnu.org>


------- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-06-05 20:13 -------
I did build with and without the patch, as said. Then i compared the test case
itself and saw no difference in size nor in content. So I compared the involved
libraries and I found that the libgcj differed in size. (The others were the
same, libgcc & libstdc++)
I then concentrated to find out what the diff is, so I compared the objdump -d
of the files and mostly I had no diff until I systematically dumped and diffed
all files.  
Here the list with files which differ when I do an objdump -dS on linux:

-rw-rw-r--    1 andreas  andreas    263420 Jun  2 10:10 BigInteger.o.diff
-rw-rw-r--    1 andreas  andreas     44207 Jun  2 10:10 Convert.o.diff
-rw-rw-r--    1 andreas  andreas    405080 Jun  2 10:10 DecimalFormat.o.diff
-rw-rw-r--    1 andreas  andreas      4491 Jun  2 10:10 finalize.o.diff
-rw-rw-r--    1 andreas  andreas      7672 Jun  2 10:10 natDouble.o.diff
-rw-rw-r--    1 andreas  andreas    120844 Jun  2 10:10 trees.o.diff
-rw-rw-r--    1 andreas  andreas     13376 Jun  2 10:10 URLDecoder.o.diff
-rw-rw-r--    1 andreas  andreas     88862 Jun  2 10:10 verify.o.diff

It is pretty difficult for me to find a pattern which is not ok.

I also attach the diffs of these files, but I can't say for sure if you get the
same diffs.

Maybe you see something obvious.

(ha, created the attachement in the meaning it comes together with the comment :)



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15813


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-06-05 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-03 22:27 [Bug libgcj/15813] New: " andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-03 22:44 ` [Bug tree-optimization/15813] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-05 20:13 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-05 20:34 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2004-06-12  3:07 ` law at redhat dot com
2004-06-15 12:12 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-25  2:06 ` mark at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-26 20:35 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-29 14:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-29 15:16 ` law at redhat dot com
2004-06-29 20:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-30 10:02 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-30 16:31 ` law at redhat dot com
2004-07-01  4:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-02 17:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040605201327.11727.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=java-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).