From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4369 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2004 11:44:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4350 invoked by uid 48); 22 Jun 2004 11:44:25 -0000 Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040622114425.4348.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040621125932.16113.bonniot@users.sf.net> References: <20040621125932.16113.bonniot@users.sf.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/16113] [3.5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault when compiling bytecode with debugging info and try/catch X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00236.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-22 11:44 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > This might be as simple as removing the call to expand_end_bindings() from > > force_poplevels(). > > Indeed! I removed this call, rebuilt libgcj and reran the testsuite (including > Jacks) and there were no regressions (only the two "err6" failures that are > anyway seen on mainline today). ...and this fixes the reported ICE as well. (Sorry, should have mentioned this.) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16113