From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16279 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2004 18:56:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16264 invoked by uid 48); 5 Aug 2004 18:56:38 -0000 Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 18:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040805185638.16262.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mckinlay at redhat dot com" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040805063144.16885.hjl@lucon.org> References: <20040805063144.16885.hjl@lucon.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/16885] [3.5 Regression] libjava isn't parallel build safe X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-q3/txt/msg00184.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2004-08-05 18:56 ------- I've seen this before when doing incremental rebuilds. I don't think it is a parallel build problem, but rather a compiler bug that occurs when it gets a certain combination of class vs java files during the build. Doing a clean rebuild has always fixed it for me. Next time I see it in my tree, I will try and debug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16885