From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-prs-return-3213-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3698 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2004 20:11:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-prs-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3676 invoked by uid 48); 8 Aug 2004 20:11:16 -0000
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 20:11:00 -0000
From: "thhal at mailblocks dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20040808201114.16923.thhal@mailblocks.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug java/16923] New: Options passed to JNI_CreateJavaVM are ignored
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-q3/txt/msg00193.txt.bz2
List-Id: <java-prs.sourceware.org>

Options that are passed in the JavaVMInitArgs structure passed to the
JNI_CreateJavaVM function seems to be completely ignored. The following code
should result in a setting of the system property "some.property" but it doesn't.

	JNIEnv* env;
	JavaVMInitArgs vm_args;
	JavaVMOption options[1];

	options[0].optionString = "-Dsome.property=propval";
	options[0].extraInfo = 0;

	vm_args.nOptions = 1;
	vm_args.options  = &options;
	vm_args.version  = JNI_VERSION_1_4;
	vm_args.ignoreUnrecognized = JNI_TRUE;

	if(JNI_CreateJavaVM(&s_javaVM, (void **)&env, &vm_args) != JNI_OK) {
		fputs("Unable to create Java VM\n", stderr);
		return 1;
	}

-- 
           Summary: Options passed to JNI_CreateJavaVM are ignored
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: java
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: thhal at mailblocks dot com
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at gcc dot gnu
                    dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16923