From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4278 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2004 18:07:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4260 invoked by uid 48); 16 Aug 2004 18:07:55 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040816180755.4259.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mckinlay at redhat dot com" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040806144324.16899.jari.korva@iki.fi> References: <20040806144324.16899.jari.korva@iki.fi> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/16899] Gcj does not produce working executables for big endian ARMs X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-q3/txt/msg00266.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2004-08-16 18:07 ------- That is strange. Unless your application code installed a security manager, System.getSecurityManager() should always return null, thus the code you commented out should never be executed anyway. The two lines you didn't comment out are a no-op, they have no effect on the return value. Could you check to make sure that the System.getSecurityManager() is returning null? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16899