From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20525 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2004 10:06:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20470 invoked by uid 48); 22 Aug 2004 10:06:11 -0000 Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 10:06:00 -0000 From: "dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Message-ID: <20040822100553.17137.dannysmith@users.sourceforge.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/17137] New: [mingw/cygwin] Conflicting JNI function declarations X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-q3/txt/msg00304.txt.bz2 List-Id: This has been reported to Java list. Reporting here so it doesn't get lost. While testing a patch to fix PR c++/15774 (Conflicting function decls not diagnosed) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15774 I get this in libjava build. ../../../gcc/libjava/jni.cc: In function `java::lang::Object* _Jv_JNI_ToReflectedField(JNIEnv*, java::lang::Class*, _Jv_Field*, jboolean)' : ../../../gcc/libjava/jni.cc:1612: error: new declaration `java::lang::Object* _Jv_JNI_ToReflectedField(JNIEnv*, java::lang::Class*, _Jv_Field*, jboolean)' ./java/lang/reflect/Field.h:70: error: ambiguates old declaration `java::lang::Object* _Jv_JNI_ToReflectedField(_Jv_JNIEnv*, java::lang::Class*, _Jv_Field*, jboolean)' ../../../gcc/libjava/jni.cc: In function `java::lang::Object* _Jv_JNI_ToReflectedMethod(JNIEnv*, java::lang::Class*, _Jv_Method*, jboolean)': ../../../gcc/l -- Summary: [mingw/cygwin] Conflicting JNI function declarations Product: gcc Version: 3.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-mingw32 GCC host triplet: i686-pc-mingw32 GCC target triplet: i686-pc-mingw32 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17137