From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25367 invoked by alias); 25 Aug 2004 16:16:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25347 invoked by uid 48); 25 Aug 2004 16:16:35 -0000 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040825161635.25344.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mckinlay at redhat dot com" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040825154545.17187.mckinlay@redhat.com> References: <20040825154545.17187.mckinlay@redhat.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/17187] Call to java.lang.Object constructor is redundant X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-q3/txt/msg00325.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2004-08-25 16:16 ------- pinskia: bytecode compilation is a different story. Obviously we should only do this when compiling to _native_ code. We know our java.lang.Object constructor doesn't do anything, but we can't make that assumption about other implementations. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17187