From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29921 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2004 20:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29902 invoked by uid 48); 11 Oct 2004 20:13:39 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041011201339.29901.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040903202714.17311.hjl@lucon.org> References: <20040903202714.17311.hjl@lucon.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/17311] Wrong libgcc_s.so.1 is used by lt-gij X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-q4/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:13 ------- I read through these patches a little. I don't understand why ltmain.sh is the way it is, but Gary's comment seemed appropriate. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg02333.html Doesn't the second patch eliminate the need for the first one? I still don't understand why the second patch is needed, though. To me it looks like libjava.exp:libjava_init initializes the various forms of LD_LIBRARY_PATH appropriately, finding libgcc_s.so. Can you tell me why this doesn't work? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17311